Physicists assume that Joule's constant shows the relationship between heat and kinetic energy, and that the measurement of Joule's constant shows that heat transforms into ½mv², not mv.

There is no real Joule's constant. The number stems from illusion, as often occurs when allowing perception to contradict logic.

James P. Joule supposedly measured the constant in 1845. In actuality, he did not have the slightest ability to make such a measurement.

Joule claimed to have stirred water in a wooden bucket and measured the heat produced. The kinetic energy was said to be determined by weights which were dropped to turn a paddle in the water.

There were no thermal constants at that time to determine where the heat was going. Joule was producing such a minuscule amount of heat that it would have dissipated into the environment in a few seconds, while he stirred the water for one or two hours. Yet his error was supposedly only a few parts per thousand (ppt).

He did not describe the details in his brief publication. What he said was that he dropped the weights 12 yards (11m), rewinding and dropping them 16 times for each measurement of temperature. The temperature increase was 0.5°F or less. The weights were four pounds each, and two were used for balance. The rate of decent was said to be one foot per second.

Joule was not a physicist. He mimicked what physicists were doing. When they ran into problems which they could not solve, Joule claimed to have a gimmick for solving them.

To account for environmental influences, he used the word "climinate." Here's the way he said it: "A series of nine experiments were performed in the above manner, and nine experiments were made in order to climinate the cooling or heating effects of the atmosphere." Nothing more.

There was no way to account for environmental effects experimentally. If he wanted someone to assume he equilibrated, his result would have been de-equilibration. He then would not have had a starting temperature for making calculations.

All Joule did by climinating was de-equilibrate. To equilibrate is to let something sit long enough to define a starting temperature. Joule destroyed the starting temperature which he needed to make calculations. It means he made no real calculations.

Another problem is that he had to wind the weights back up sixteen times, and the water would have been stirred while winding. There is no evidence of a slip clutch in photographs of the device, which still exists. Winding up the weights would not have produced a known amount of heat, because the force and energy would vary with velocity.

He said he used floats to prevent the water from rotating. Floats would not have been effective. The problem with rotating water is that the weights would drop at an increasing rate as the water rotation increased. The acceleration would reduce force on the cords, and it would add kinetic energy to the weights.

The reason why Joule did those things and said those things is because real physicists were trying to do exactly what Joule was doing but failing. So Joule copied them but pretended to be successful. They gave up trying, while Joule ran to a complicit publisher with his lies.

It's important to note that the same thing happened with relativity. Real physicists were discussing and rejecting all elements of relativity, while Einstein plagiarized them and got a description published as if it were his own ideas. In other words, frauds don't originate their own ideas; they aren't that intelligent. Einstein was one of the stupidest persons in science, which is why he was working in a patent office, until his frauds were found to be exploitable.

There is also a message about publishers in Joule's constant and relativity: It is the publishers and grant providers who shape science, and they have turned modern science into a fraud machine.

Concerning Joule's constant, there are theoretical problems on the relationships between force and energy which physicists do not understand. Some of the force would have been elastic creating stress instead of heat. Physicists have no theoretical concepts for the relationships between elastic and inelastic forces when stirring water.

Joule's corrupt standards were demonstrated even more dramatically in experiments which he did with an electrical generator before switching to the wooden bucket experiment. He supposedly got the constant within about 10% doing a variety of those experiments. But they defied principles of physics besides being technically impossible.

The basic procedure was to put a coil in a test-tube with water and spin it in a magnetic field for fifteen minutes. The kinetic energy on a hand crank was compared to the heat in the water.

He used a galvanometer to measure electrical energy. It is a coil with a pointer, and the current flows through it. There were no concepts of volts or amps in those days. So he said he referenced the galvanometer to the blue color of a chemical in a solution. He then used its reading as a fudge factor which he called "unity." One of his errors was that a single instrument will not measure electrical energy. Both volts and amps need to be known.

He had no theoretical concepts of what he was measuring. Sometimes he charged batteries. Some of the energy would go into the battery and some would heat the coil. He had no way of determining the energy going into the battery. In one experiment, he said he disconnected the wires and still got the constant. There should have been no force with the wires disconnected.

Physicists say Joule must have known what he was doing, because he was only off by 4 ppt from the number they get. His number was 4.2 Joules per calorie; the modern number is 4.186 Joules per calorie.

Instead of the modern measurement justifying Joule's experiments, it is Joule's experiments which tell the truth about the modern measurement. Since Joule did not have suitable theoretical concepts nor the slightest technical ability to produce such a measurement, the number has to be a contrivance.

Physicists would say they do actual experiments. It only shows that they to are contrivers. Their methodology nowdays is to compress a gas to show the relationship between force and heat. What? Am I missing something? Compressing a gas does not produce significant heat. If it did, compression would not be elastic, which it obviously is. If they measure the heat produced by an elastic compression, they are not measuring a transformation.

Regardless of how they conduct the modern experiments, Joule's constant is shown to be a contrivance due to the fact that the definition of energy is shown to be in error through my mathematics.

Observations without logic are not reliable in science, because the force, distance, and temperature of any measurement can be altered through spirit powers originating either with the researchers or in the spirit world. Such effects are normally accounted for in the irreproducibility of scientific measurements. In the biological sciences, there are an infinite number of ways of measuring effects, and there are infinite points of logic showing relationships. The errors conflict each time different measurements are made, while the consistent relationships are reinforced and aligned upon the logic. The result is an evolution of truth. But physics is more abstract than biology, and the evolution of truth is not as effective.

Usually, the claim is that coincidence is proof. Coincidence in science is a guarantee of corruption, because forces in the spirit world will create the coincidences, even if the researchers don't know it. An example is the supposed proof of relativity by the aberration in the orbit of the planet Mercury. The calculations and measurement had the exact same numbers for four digits. Having the same numbers is a joke, but it is called proof. In fact, the probability of having the same numbers is so close to zero that it's more of a proof of meddling.

Logic defines knowledge. Producing basic knowledge is the purpose of science. Physicists have been denying that science needs logic, because quantum mechanics and relativity are in conflict with logic. But physicists are wrong. There is no knowledge without logic and no purpose to science besides producing a logic consistent with the laws of nature, which have to have consistent relationships to be functional. Logic means consistent relationships.

It is the logic that determines the truth in science, not perception. Perception is highly prone to illusion and erroneous assumptions. Logic, however, can be determined definitively. Mathematics which is simple enough to be beyond question is the strictest logic in science. So it is the mathematical proof that determines the definition of energy, not observations of questionable experiments.

When a person mentions anything spiritual to a scientist, the usual response is that there is no evidence for spiritual existence. Now there is. Physicists prove the existence of the spirit world every time they measure Joule's constant, because there is no such number beyond contrivance through spirit powers.

I also have another proof of spirit influence. The image below could not have been produced through anything but spirit influence, as it was a paint brush cleaning.

Crop Circles are Irrefutable Proof

Here's a link to a page which shows a few dozen extremely complex and precise crop circles. The official line for the public is that crop circles are produced by "Doug and Dave" types with a board. The scientists who study crop circles say it has to be alien technology which uses radiation, because no human technology could do it. There's quite a leap between "Doug and Dave" and super-human technology.

Of course, there's no such aliens either. Only spirit force can produce such a result. These crop circles are produce in a matter of minutes during the night, often while observers are present. Each stem is precisely located often bending in a different direction from the ones near it. There are no aberrations such as tracks.

The Crop Circle Photo Page

Reference: Energy: Historical Development of the Concept. R. Bruce Lindsay. 1975.

Three books proving spirit influences.
A large Crop Circle in Micro Seconds
The Spirit World
Energy Home